Is it Good Practice to have Multiple Sites in a Single Domain with Common Site Boundaries?

Goto the SMS Home Page

 
Is it a good practice to have multiple Sites in a single domain with common Site boundaries?

I want to have an SMS site just to keep all server info (I have approximately 500 Servers world wide) and my manager wants to keep server information separate from desktops and laptop inventory and different SMS agent settings too. What would you recommend for this type of setup?

Contributed By: Wally Mead [MS]
No, it is not a good practice to have multiple sites sharing common boundaries. It is perfectly fine to have multiple sites in the same domain (we have customers with hundreds of SMS sites in a single domain), but you should not have multiple sites sharing a common boundary. That makes it hard to isolate your clients to a specific SMS site (when technically they'd be members of multiple sites due to the common IP subnets).

It’s fine to have multiple domains in a single SMS site, or multiple sites in a hierarchy. It does make it a little bit easier if you have separate domains for sites that are sharing common site boundaries. However, it is still not recommended to have multiple sites sharing site boundaries.

If you want a separate site for management of servers, then you'd have to either have all the servers on unique subnets from the clients (and only list those subnets on the server site) or have shared boundaries, and be careful to not allow clients to be installed into that site.
 

© FAQShop.com 2003 - 2008

Goto the SMS Home Page

Email the Author